 |
 |
  
  
|
      
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Forest
Guild Hires Howard Gross to be new Executive Director
|
| Santa
Fe, NM (November 28, 2006) – Henry Carey, President
of the Forest Guild, announced that the Board of Directors
has completed the search for a new executive director and
has hired Howard Gross, effective January 2, 2007. Howard
has a long and impressive background in field research,
natural resource management and non-profit leadership.
Stated Carey, “The Directors believe that hiring Howard
is an important step in the progressive maturing of the
Guild. Membership is climbing, regional meetings are springing
up around the country and the Guild’s voice is increasingly
sought on silvicultural and policy issues. The Directors
and I are confident that Howard will accelerate this progress
across the country.”
Before coming to the Forest Guild, Gross worked with the
National Parks Conservation Association in Joshua Tree,
CA to protect and generate increased public support for
Joshua Tree and Death Valley national parks, the Mojave
National Preserve and surrounding desert areas. He used
his experience in fund raising, coalition building, research
and strategic solutions planning to successfully address
issues similar to those that affect Guild foresters.
From 1999-2003 Howard was Executive Director for HawkWatch
International, which works to monitor and protect birds
of prey and their environment. Howard was formally recognized
by Pronatura Veracruz (Mexico) and the Hawk Migration Association
of North America for his contributions to raptor conservation.
Howard also worked for five years as a Watershed Ecologist
and Project Manager for SWCA Environmental Consultants in
Utah.
Howard received an M.S. in Watershed Science from Utah State
University in 1994 and a B.S. in Mathematical Sciences from
the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 1984.
He has published peer-reviewed articles and presented at
scientific conferences on a diverse range of topics.
"I look forward to working with the Guild's membership,
staff, board, and partners to promote excellent forestry,
expand the services provided to members, and grow our regional
programs,” Howard said upon learning he had been hired
as Executive Director, adding, "My life's work over
the last seventeen years has been focused on stewardship
of our nation's natural heritage. I hope this experience
proves to be an asset to the Forest Guild."
|
|

Howard Gross, new executive director
of Forest Guild. |
|
| |
| Forest
Guild Develops Rating System for Working Forest Conservation
Easements. New report to help evaluate proposed easements
|
| November
28, 2006 – "Conservation easements that emphasize
working forests represent the future of conservation and
responsible resource use across the country.” stated
Forest Guild Research Director Zander Evans at a recent
staff meeting, adding that, “Bob Perschel's perspective
piece is a valuable guide to understanding this evolving
tool." Zander was referring to a new report just released
by the Forest Guild that helps land trusts and the public
gauge the effectiveness of conservation easements in ensuring
sustainable forestry. Authored by the Guild’s NE Regional
Director Bob Perschel, the report, Ensuring Sustainable
Forestry Through Working Forest Conservation Easements in
the Northeast analyzes three key New England easements and
identifies eleven criteria that can be effectively used
to evaluate current and proposed easements.
Forest Guild Maine Coordinator, Andy Shultz, is confident
that the new report will help evaluate conservation proposals
in Maine. “This is a great tool for landowners, easement
holders and all stakeholders in these negotiations. It is
particularly timely as the Plum Creek proposal for the Moosehead
Region is in the spotlight now. The Forest Guild's voice
is clearly represented here."
Jensen Bissell, Director of Baxter State Park in Maine,
agrees. "Forest conservation easements are growing
as a mechanism to conserve working forestland, but the variety
of approaches may not ensure that the forests will retain
their value to society over the long term. The field foresters
of the Forest Guild have produced an excellent aid for measuring
the real value and future effectiveness of forest conservation
easements."
Two of the case studies in the report cover large Maine
easements: the Pingree easement of 2001 and the West Branch
project of 2003. Explained Perschel, “It was essential
to examine and analyze large easements that were influential
and precedent setting… It's time we heard from the
field foresters about the growing use of working forest
conservation easements to protect our forestlands.”
The largest easement in the country, the Pingree transaction,
focused on protecting the forest from development. The price
per acre was low and most of the funding came from private
sources. In comparison, the West Branch transaction utilized
public funding and went through a lengthy negotiation process
to ensure that sustainable forestry would be practiced.
Both easements received high ratings using the new system.
“We have to remember that working forest conservation
easements are a relatively new tool and we are learning
as we go,” said Perschel. “We can learn from
the hard work that went into completing these deals and
do even better on the next ones.”
Ensuring Sustainable Forestry Through Working Forest
Conservation Easements identifies eleven design approaches
to easements that provide progressively more assurance that
sustainable forestry will be achieved. The best example
of high assurance easements may be seen in the Peck-Hull-Norcross
Easement and Covenant in western and central Massachusetts.
This easement was successful because it contained very specific
prescriptions for forestry practices. Norcross Program Director
and forester Dan Donahue helped negotiate the easement.
“Norcross has very specific goals directed toward
conserving wildlife. As a contributor of funds to the easement;
we wanted to know that those goals would be met in perpetuity.
We were able to build into the easement a set of guidelines
that allowed us to be very specific in the kinds of forestry
systems that would be used.”
While each land ownership is different and there is no “one
size fits all” WFCE, the publication delineates how
a number of key components can be selectively combined to
design the most practical, efficient, ecological, silvicultural
and economical easements possible all across the country.
Click here
to download a pdf of Ensuring Sustainable Forests Through
Working Forest Conservation Easements.
|
|
|
| |
| New
Mexico Fire Planning Task Force approves Greater Cuba Community
Wildfire Protection Plan
|
| The
New Mexico Fire Planning Task Force has approved the collaboratively
developed Greater Cuba Community Wildfire Protection Plan
(CWPP). This planning document which covers 6 communities
in the western Jemez Mountains surrounding Cuba NM is a
prerequisite to enable communities access to federal funds
to reduce hazardous fuels. Forest Guild collaborated with
Jim Hughes, SWCA Consultants, Village of Cuba, Sandoval
County, Cuba Regional Economic Development Organization,
Greater Eastern Jemez Wildland-Urban Interface Council,
Bureau of Land Management, Santa Fe National Forest, New
Mexico State Forestry, and members of each of the communities
to develop a comprehensive CWPP to prioritize the landscape
for fire protection and management attention. A comprehensive
continuous coverage weighted overlay hazard analysis was
performed with community input to assess critical areas.
Forest Guild incorporated a community capacity index into
the CWPP to identify communities that have moderate to low
capacity to mitigate the risks of wildfire, and who may
have difficulties recovering from a catastrophic event.
In addition, Forest Guild partnered with Jemez Mountain
Electric Coop to insert community surveys into electric
utility bills to all residents in the appropriate areas.
Please download the Greater Cuba CWPP here.
For further questions please contact Eytan Krasilovsky at
eytan@forestguild.org
|
|

Santa Fe National Forest around
Cuba ©Scott Morris |
|
| |
| Support
to the Forest Restoration Sector - NM Wood Products Information
|
| October,
2006 — Wood use and forest based businesses have changed
dramatically in recent decades. The forests of northern New
Mexico have generally moved away from timber production. At
the same time, the increase of large catastrophic wildfires
and the resulting national and state policies and directives
indicate that wildfire and forest health are major concerns
to both land management entities and forest dependent communities
that require management action. The social and economic capacity
to implement this management action varies widely. As part
of the North-Central New Mexico Landscape Assessment (NCNMLA),
Forest Guild recognized the link between forest restoration
and the economic capacity needed to implement and subsidize
these activities In response to this need, Forest Guild developed
a wood user and processor map in coordination with ForestERA
(www.forestera.nau.edu)
for use in landscape-level planning and prioritization of
forest management in the North-Central New Mexico Landscape
Assessment area.
more>
|
| New
Mexico Forest Restoration Principles Announced
by Diverse Task Force
|
| ALBUQUERQUE
(May 17, 2006)—In an unprecedented collaborative effort,
13 organizations jointly announced the release of the New
Mexico Forest Restoration Principles that will reduce conflict
and legal challenges for forest harvesting projects in New
Mexico. The 18-member New Mexico Biomass Evaluation Task Force
announced today publication of 18 principles for the design
and implementation of forest restoration projects that would
produce small-diameter wood used to fuel biomass power plants
and other wood utilizing facilities.
The New Mexico Forest Restoration Principles came after representatives
from a diverse group of land management agencies and conservation
organizations spent almost a year working together to achieve
a set of principles that they all support.
The group was formed after Public Service Company of New Mexico
(PNM) approached the USDA Forest Service in 2004 about ways
to secure a large scale supply of woody material for use in
biomass burning power plants in the State. PNM estimated they
would need about 7.7 million tons of biomass over a 30-year
plant life for a single 35 mega-watt plant. This equates to
about 260,000 tons per year, or 735 tons per day. Removing
an average of 20 tons of biomass per acre and still leaving
an intact forested landscape could result in about 35 acres
per day or 10,000 acres per year being treated.
Southwestern Regional Forester Harv Forsgren said, “I
congratulate PNM and the Task Force for their hard work to
come up with a common set of Principles. We will continue
to follow our existing Forest Plans and on-going environmental
studies in compliance with the National Environmental Policy
Act. These Principles will be a helpful addition for the five
national forests in New Mexico to use when doing environmental
studies for many forest restoration projects.”
The amount of biomass fuel needed for the PNM project, presented
a potential challenge since people have differing views on
how the land management agencies should remove fuels, reduce
the wildfire threats to communities, and still leave healthier
forests in a more natural state. Use of these principles would
reduce controversy and potential legal challenges for forest
restoration projects of this magnitude, while ensuring that
both ecological and economic goals are met.
Todd Schulke who represented the Center for Biological Diversity
on the Task Force said, “The long-term viability of
any biomass utilization plant depends on buy-in from people
who care deeply about forest lands in New Mexico. The agreement
embodied in the Principles is unprecedented in my experience.”
New Mexico State Forester Butch Blazer said, “It’s
my belief that because of the Task Force’s work, we
will see significant reductions in time lost due to the kind
of red tape that can affect these kinds of fuels reduction
projects in New Mexico. I also believe these could be used
by other southwestern states.”
Brent Racher, a task force member from Restoration Solutions,
a company that specializes in high-volume biomass harvesting,
said,” These Principles are great. I think they will
help get reliable supplies of biomass, create viable new businesses,
improve forest health, and reduce the threats of wildfires
for communities in New Mexico.”
"These principles will augment the on-going range and
forest restoration programs that are in place at the Land
Office," said Commissioner of Public Lands Patrick Lyons.
"I appreciate the effort of everyone involved who is
helping facilitate policies that can be shared by government
agencies and conservation groups across the Southwest."
The New Mexico Forest Restoration Principles can be found
at: http://www.fs.fed.us/r3/spf/
New Mexico Biomass Evaluation Taskforce Primary Contact List:
| Primary Contact List |
| Name |
Affiliation |
Phone |
|
Patrick McCarthy |
The Nature Conservancy |
505-988-1542, x 217 |
|
Mike DeBonis |
Forest Guild |
505-983-8992, x 14 |
|
Dave Borland |
USDI Bureau of Land Management |
505-438-7523 |
|
Margot Wilson |
Sierra Club Rio Grande Chapter |
505-744-5860 |
|
Jerry Payne |
USDAForest Service |
505-842-3391 |
|
Todd Schulke |
Center for Biological Diversity |
505-388-8799 |
|
Kim Kostelnik |
NM State Forestry |
505-476-3337 |
|
John Waconda |
USDI Bureau of Indian Affairs |
505-563-3360 |
|
Bryan Bird |
Forest Guardians |
505-988-9126, x 157 |
|
John Tunberg |
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service |
505-761- 4488 |
| Jim Norwick |
NM State Land Office |
505-827-5095 |
| Brent Racher |
Restoration Solutions |
505-627-7577 |
| Marc Christensen |
Public Service Company of New Mexico |
505-241-2882 |
| Rosemary Romero |
Rosemary Romero Consulting (Facilitator) |
505-982-9805 |
|
|
|
| |
back to top
|
|
 |
| ©2004
Forest Guild, POB 519 Santa Fe, NM 87504 PH: 505-983-8992 |